 |
SUMMARY
Analyses of the data collected during REVEAL II indicate:
Visibility conditions:
- *In accord with analysis of the REVEAL data sets, average visibility as determined from
nephelometer measurements is better at CHIL than CLBR. During REVEAL II the
average meteorological range at both sites calculated for periods of simultaneous
measurements were as follows: CLBR = 30 km, CHIL = 36 km.
- *Although there is a high degree of spatial correlation between light scattering
measurements, light scattering is higher and more variable at CLBR than CHIL.
- Summertime visibility episodes in the central-eastern FV often occur after a period of
elevated ozone concentrations.
- Surface visual range from Vancouver and Abbotsford International Airports, light
scattering from nephelometers, and visibility estimated from photographs show a high
degree of association.
- Light scattering measurements from CLBR and CHIL show the highest degree of
association (correlation) in the daytime. This implies that at night local conditions may
be decoupled from regional air quality.
PM10 concentrations (PM10 = particulate matter with diameter less than 10 µm):
- Hourly PM10 concentrations observed using TEOMs deployed at a number of sites in the
Fraser Valley exceeded 30 µgm-3 on an average of one hour in ten, and occasionally
exceeded 50 µgm-3 during REVEAL II.
- PM10 concentrations in the valley were highest at T28 (Downtown Abbotsford).
- On average PM2.5 contributes in excess of half of 24 hour average PM10. (This indicates
the presence of significant quantities of secondary aerosols.)
PM2.5 concentrations and composition (PM2.5 = particulate matter with diameter less than
2.5 µm):
- Average fine mass measured during REVEAL, was approximately 8 µgm-3 at CLBR and
9 µgm-3 at CHIL. These values are six times the natural background concentration
proposed for the western USA.
- Comparison of elemental concentrations and fine mass from duplicate filter A analyses
conducted at University of Guelph and University of California at Davis indicate a high
correlation, but significant differences between absolute reported elemental
concentrations for most of the measured species. Click here for sample plots of fine
mass, sulphur and light absorption.
- Inorganic aerosol species dominated measured fine mass during REVEAL II at both
CLBR and CHIL but organic aerosols are a consistently high proportion of measured
mass.
- Elemental carbon concentration were significantly higher at CHIL than CLBR which may
reflect the local influence of diesel tucks at the Chilliwack Works Yard.
- The mean seasonal contributions of the five components of fine mass indicate: Highest
nitrate and sulphate were observed in the summer. Highest organic mass was observed in
the autumn and winter seasons. Lowest elemental carbon concentrations were observed
during the summer. Highest soil concentrations were observed in winter perhaps due to
the influence of strong outflow events and the large source areas available during the
winter season.
PM2.5 and visibility conditions:
- *Average particle light scattering efficiencies are higher at CLBR than CHIL. This
indicates that on a per unit mass basis aerosols at CLBR degrade visibility more
efficiently than those sampled at CHIL. This reflects differing aerosol composition and
is an explanation of the observation that meteorological range is lower at CLBR despite
lower average fine mass.
- Reconstructed light scattering budgets indicate inorganic aerosol species dominated light
scattering at both CLBR and CHIL.
- Days with high light scattering were characterized by higher nitrate and organic aerosol
concentrations suggesting that these aerosol components may be the primary cause of
variability of visibility conditions.
Source apportionment of PM2.5:
- Receptor modeling to identify sources of ambient aerosols indicates the following
components dominate the sources of fine mass at the two receptor sites:
| CLBR: |
Mobile emissions, secondary aerosols, primary geologic materials, industrial emissions
and a marine contribution (listed in terms of average contribution to measured mass). |
| CHIL: |
Mobile emissions, secondary aerosols, primary diesel emissions, primary geologic
materials, a marine contribution and a local component (dominated by iron) (listed in
terms of average contribution to measured mass). |
All items listed with an asterisk indicate findings which indicate the impact of local ammonia
emissions on local visibility conditions and fine aerosol speciation. This hypothesis which was
first presented in Pryor and Barthelmie (1996) is in good accord with observed aerosol
ammonium measurements which indicate higher ammonium concentrations at CLBR than
CHIL.
Reports from which these results are taken:
Pryor S.C. and Barthelmie R.J. (1996): REVEAL II: Characterizing fine aerosols in the Lower
Fraser Valley. Final report of Part 1 analysis and database. Submitted to Fraser Cheam Regional
District, Chilliwack.
Pryor S.C. and Barthelmie R.J. (1999): REVEAL II: Characterizing fine aerosols in the Lower
Fraser Valley. Final report of data analysis and database construction. Submitted to Fraser
Cheam Regional District, Chilliwack.
|