IU Home Pages - Logo   September 19, 2003  
 
Home Events FYI Headliners Health Liberal arts Outreach Technology Research Contact +
Conversations Viewpoint Fast facts Web mastery @ Work Photographer's corner Friday flashback
Research
How history defines the present...
By Susan Williams
Photo by Chris Meyer
Patrick Brantlinger, Rudy Professor of English at IU Bloomington

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

—George Santayana, American poet and philosopher in Reason in Common Sense (1906) Author William L. Shirer used Santayana’s words as epigraph for Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959)

Patrick Brantlinger’s new book, Dark Vanishings: Discourse on the Extinction of Primitive Races, 1800-1930, is not about current events, but it is difficult, indeed, to keep from thinking about today’s new frontiers of genomics and proteomics or of a global climate in which one group is hell-bent on eradicating another.

In Dark Vanishings (Cornell University Press), Brantlinger, the Rudy Professor of English at IU Bloomington, looks at the commonly held 19th-century belief that all “primitive” or “savage” races around the world were doomed sooner or later to extinction, and defines the stereotype of the “self-exterminating savage.” Closely related to the idea of “the noble savage,” who embodied the romantic notion of man unencumbered by civilization, the primitive or savage races came to be seen as genetically and socially inferior, usually by European interlopers in the guise of imperialists.

After 1859, Charles Darwin’s “survival through natural selection” theory had become widely accepted, and some social scientists were applying it to society.

Thus, Brantlinger explained in an interview about his book, “‘savage customs,’ such as warfare, cannibalism and human sacrifice, were often viewed as the main cause of the demise of savage ‘races.’”

Social Darwinism also opportunistically enabled the spread of imperialism. At its most basic, imperialism is defined as the process in which the dominant political and economic interests of one nation expropriate for their own benefit the land, labor, raw material and markets of another people. Using savagery and the lower level of cultural evolution as proof of inferior evolution, proponents of imperialism generally supported the idea that colonized peoples were biologically inferior.

In Dark Vanishings, Brantlinger analyzes the Irish Famine in the context of ideas and theories about primitive races in North America, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere. He shows that by the end of the 19th century, especially through the influence of the eugenics movement, extinction discourse was ironically applied to the “great white race” in various apocalyptic ways.

“The Irish peasantry,” he said, “from the Elizabethan period forward, were often compared to ‘savages’ elsewhere in the world—except that they did not even have the ‘excuse’ of savage customs for their ignorance (or superstition: read, illiteracy and Catholicism), their poverty, their alleged overpopulation and their starvation. The famine was an example of mass extinction close to home, among a people of European race, Celtic, which seemed analogous to the extinctions of primitive, or non-Western races around the world under the impact of imperialism.”

According to Brantlinger, after Darwin, social Darwinists and “eugenicists” started to worry about the degeneration and possible extinction of “the great white race.” Francis Galton, Darwin’s cousin, coined the term “well-born” and founded the eugenics movement, the idea that the population could be improved by controlled breeding for desirable, inherited characteristics. Galton thought that biological inheritance of leadership qualities had determined the social status of the British ruling class.

“Especially through the eugenics movement,’ said Brantlinger, “the discourse about the extinction of so-called primitive races came home to roost in many ironic and often horrific ways, sterilization of the so-called ‘unfit,’ for instance.”
American eugenicists, many of whom privately supported the idea of euthanasia and genocide, popularized legally mandated sterilization of the socially inadequate in the early 20th century. The “socially inadequate” included those in institutions or those maintained wholly or in part at public expense. Also defined as “socially inadequate” were the feeble-minded, insane, criminalistic, epileptic, inebriate, diseased, blind, deaf, deformed and dependent, such as orphans, tramps, the homeless and paupers.

By 1914, when the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law was published, 12 states had already written such laws, including Indiana, which became the first to enact it by sterilizing a “degenerate” in 1907.

Brantlinger continues his look at the self-exterminating savage stereotype through the pre-World War II years. With the rise of fascism and Nazism, and with the gradual renewal of aboriginal populations in some parts of the world, by the 1930s the idea of “fatal impact” began to unravel, as did also various more general forms of race-based thinking and of social Darwinsim.