4b. Quote from primary documents written
in the past; this constitutes evidence. Because what scholars (like
Anderson and Cayton) write constitutes interpretation, not evidence, you should
not quote them. Instead, paraphrase their ideas into your own words, and
cite them in a footnote or endnote. Of course, you may quote from any
primary documents from the past that scholars use as evidence. Again,
cite where you found the quote.
5. Each paragraph should end with a concluding sentence explaining
how the evidence of that paragraph contributed to the paragraph’s main analytical
point and to your paper's overarching thesis.
6. Avoid the passive voice, such as “There began slavery in Virginia."
Instead, always use the active voice: who did what, when, how and why.
7. Avoid reification, such as “Slavery encouraged white people
to stick together.” People -- not concepts like “slavery”
or “globalization” -- make
history happen.
8a. Important abstract terms such as “individualism” or “freedom”
should be defined. The meaning of such broad terms is contested in the
present as it was in the past, and thus you must specify your definition of them
(a dictionary definition does not suffice).
8b. Unpleasant terms from the past, like “negro,” should be put in quotation marks. Unsavory value judgments from the past, like “civilized” or “barbaric,” should also be put in quotation marks. Without quotation marks, it looks like you are agreeing with such unsavory values.
9. Avoid phrases like “people,” “individuals,” “they,”
“colonists,” “Americans,” etc.
Always identify the specific social group you are discussing.
10. Be attentive to time frames and dates as you describe historical
change and continuity. Briefly identify and date any people, institutions,
or documents you mention. Use the past tense; history happened in the
past.