IRAP Logo   IU Seal

Year 3 Course Pages

IRAP Year 3: Small Group Instruction Lesson Delivery 1: Assignment #3

Initial Planning

 

Assignment #1

 

Assignment #2

 

Small Group Instruction Lesson Delivery 1

 

Assignment #3

 

Implementation Phase 1

 

Assignment #4

 

Assignment #5

 

Small Group Instruction Lesson Delivery 2

 

Assignment #6

 

Implementation Phase 2

 

Assignment #7

During this phase, you will develop a plan for implementing and evaluating the two strategies you have chosen to achieve your goal.  This is the “who, what, when, where, why, and how” of implementing your plan. 

 

How do I develop a plan?

Begin developing your plan by thinking and writing about the following:

 

Who: Give specific information about your chosen students.

 

What: What strategies will you be using with these students? Detail how you will implement each strategy.

 

When: How often will you work on each strategy? Give a time

frame: Twenty-minutes a day for a month? Two hours, three times

a week, for two months?

 

Where: In what location will you and your students be working?

 

Why: Give your rationale for the decisions made.

 

How: What items will you collect to see if students are improving?

What activities will you observe?

 

How do I collect data?

Your plan must include how you will collect the information you need to see if your strategies are successful. It is important that you keep the data you collect until the end of the course. Data can be collected from a variety of sources, including the following:

  • Observational notes.

  • Student surveys.

  • Discussions with students (keep anecdotal records).

  • Student work.

  • Rubrics, checklists, graphic organizers, teacher-made tests.

  • DIBELS, ISTEP.

You will submit the plan for implementing your two strategies and include two ways you will evaluate progress for each strategy. One of the two evaluations must be student observations.

 

Consider the following examples:

 

Strategy #1:  Repeated reading.

Methods of gathering data:  student observation/note taking and DIBELS. 

 

Strategy #2:   Readers’ theater.

Methods of gathering data:  student observation/fluency checklist and student surveys.

1. Student* Observation Data

 

(Repeated Reading Process)

 

 

Who: I will implement a repeated reading procedure with, Matthew, a student in my classroom who is struggling with reading fluency.

What: Repeated reading procedure

Step 1: Together, Matt and I will choose a text for him to read. He will read the unpracticed text to me and graph the words per minute. Together we will set a goal for WPM, phrasing, and intonation.

Step 2: I will provide direct instruction on chunking the text for phrasing and expression. In addition, I will model fluent reading of the text several times.

Step 3: Matt will practice rereading the text for fluency. He may practice the text alone, with me, or with a partner. He will practice reading the text until he feels he is reading it fluently. Then he will record his reading and replay it  to analyze his own fluency.

Step 4: Matt will read the text to me a final time, and we will graph the WPM again. A new text will be chosen, and the procedure will begin again. The procedure will continue for 4 weeks.

Where: My classroom.

When: Each cycle should take one week to complete.

Why: The process I’ve developed is a combination of several repeated reading techniques I’ve read about. I want to find out if repeated reading will increase my student’s fluency in terms of word recognition, phrasing, expression and rate. 

Observing Matthew during the procedure will allow me to do the following:

1. Watch his reaction to repeated readings. I can consider if it’s a viable strategy to use with other struggling readers.

2. Consider if  my modeling of fluent reading impacts Matt’s readings.

3. Determine if allowing Matt to choose the text (with guidance from me) is the best course of action for increasing fluency.

4. Explore which method of practicing the text is preferred by the student and which yields the most time-on-task.

 

2. Student Observation Data

 

(Fluency Checklist)

 

Who: I will observe the student as he works with Ms. Todd, the inclusion teacher, in a small group setting.

What: I will use a checklist I developed based on the Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) for primary grades.

Where: My classroom.

When: During his small group guided reading time 1-2 times per week.

 

Why: The checklist I developed is designed to look for more than just reading rate. I will be listening for automaticity, intonation, and phrasing.

Fluent reading is more than a fast reading rate. I developed the checklist to monitor the student’s ability to recognize words, read expressively, and read with proper phrasing.

The checklist will allow me to refine the lessons I do with the student during the modeling and explicit teaching parts of the repeated reading procedure.

 

3. DIBELS Data

Who: Matt

What: I will compare the student’s words per minute (WPM) scores before and after the repeated reading intervention.

Where: My classroom.

When: DIBELS assessments will be administered weekly.

 

Why: I want to know if the repeated reading group activity increases his reading rate and word recognition on cold readings.

 

*You may choose to work with a small group or with an individual. 

Submitting Work

Please write all assignments in a word document and save often in case of technological difficulties. You have two choices for submitting work: 1) You may copy and paste each assignment directly into the assignment box or 2) You may attach it beneath the box as a word document in the Oncourse class site. Your work will be submitted under “Assignments,” Assignment #3. Click here to leave the IRAP web site and go to Oncourse.

 

 


Indiana Reading Academy Project (IRAP)

Indiana University

School of Education

Bloomington/Indianapolis
irap@indiana.edu

 

Contact Webmaster with questions regarding this website.

These pages were last updated on 10/06/2008.